Em As razões do Iluminismo, Sergio Paulo Rouanet refletiu sobre as tendências irracionalistas no Brasil e no mundo, e tentou opor a essas tendências um Iluminismo reformulado. Neste novo livro, dá um conteúdo conceitual mais preciso à idéia iluminista, a partir do funcionamento, em três configurações históricas - a Ilustração, o liberalismo e o socialismo -, dos momentos constitutivos do Iluminismo, que para Rouanet são a universalidade, a individualização e a autonomia.O autor explora sob vários ângulos esse tema, em ensaios (...) de caráter histórico ou teórico, versando tanto sobre a realidade brasileira como sobre a cultura mundial. Numa fase de eclipse das certezas e de exaustão dos paradigmas, Mal-estar na modernidade propõe, não uma alternativa concreta, mas o debate em torno de um caminho possível - uma civilização iluminista. (shrink)

I hope I will not be accused of mental colonialism by attributing to Europe the role which belongs to it historically: that of the Self, which leaves the position of the Other for us. Consequently, this text ought to begin with the view taken of the Other (the European view of the Brazilians) and continue with the view held by the Other (the Brazilian view of the Europeans).

This paper claims that what needs reinventing is not democracy as an ideal model, but rather the prevailing reality in terms of a set of obstacles hindering the realization of this model. Democracy can only be adapted to the new realities of the world if these realities are also transformed in such a way as to make it possible for democracy to properly function. The absence of norms on an international scale is manifested by a de facto hegemonic power accruing (...) to certain states. This paper attempts a philosophical description of this situation through the difference between globalization, that tends to reduce all individual difference, and universalization, pluralist as its purposes can only be attained through a rationality of communication. Their respective actors are also different, as well as the different models provided for the evolution of the UN system. (shrink)

The attacks of September 11 oblige us to revise a prevalent view of religion as harmless and incompatible with rational forms of knowledge. Three modes of knowledge coexist today: theological knowledge involves adhesion to a system of beliefs; technological and natural science knowledge is value-free and neutral with regard to beliefs; lastly, knowledge in philosophy, social and human sciences relates to values, transcends national and cultural specificities and involves freedom and reason. Is this latter form of knowledge more apt to (...) preserve one’s critical conscience than other modes of knowledge? History does not, alas, corroborate this theory. All three knowledge modes, taken separately, lack both a wider rationality which would enable them to legitimize their actions in light of universal criteria, and the properties of democratic debate, the only way to avoid pathologies in thought, be they of a religious or scientific nature. In a post-secular society, religions resist all forms of secularizing influences. A true secular society is, however, able to preserve the contents of religion without destroying them. (shrink)